ctc33.03
by
Secretary of Agriculture Ann M. Veneman
Before the Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development,
Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies
Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives
February 27, 2003
"Mr. Chairman, Members of the Committee,
it is an honor for me to appear before you to discuss the fiscal year
(FY) 2004 budget for the Department of Agriculture (USDA). I have with
me today Deputy Secretary Jim Moseley, our Chief Economist, Keith Collins,
and our Budget Officer, Steve Dewhurst.
"I want to thank the Committee again
this year for its support of USDA programs and for the long history of
effective cooperation between this Committee and the Department in support
of American agriculture. I look forward to working with you, Mr. Chairman,
and all the Members of the Committee during the 2004 budget process.
"As you know, the President’s
Budget was released on February 3rd. Total USDA outlays for 2004 are estimated
to be $74.1 billion. This is an increase of $1.4 billion above the level
requested in 2003. Departmentwide discretionary outlays are estimated
at $20.2 billion, about $300 million below the 2003 requested level. The
Department’s request for discretionary budget authority before this
committee is $15.4 billion.
"This year’s budget is consistent
with this Administration’s policy book: Food and Agricultural Policy
for the 21st Century and supports the Department’s 5-year strategic
plan. This plan outlines long-term goals and strategies for providing
leadership in food, agriculture, resource and related issues, and the
2004 budget is designed to help accomplish USDA’s strategic goals
of: enhancing economic opportunities for agricultural producers; supporting
increased economic opportunities and improving quality of life in rural
America; enhancing protection and safety of the Nation’s agriculture
and food supply; improving the Nation’s nutrition and health; and
protecting and enhancing the Nation’s natural resource base and
environment.
"Because of fiscal realities, this budget
is highly constrained. However, it maintains and enhances critical programs
that supports the Department’s strategic goals by:
"For 2004, this budget supports the following
key initiatives:
- " Providing necessary funding for the
continued implementation and administration of new and expanded programs
enacted as part of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002
(Farm Bill).
- " Implementing the largest and most wide-reaching
Farm Bill conservation title ever which represents an unprecedented
investment in conservation that will have significant environmental
benefits.
- "Infants and Children (WIC) and covers
the anticipated increases in participation in the Food Stamp Program,
including legal immigrants and others newly eligible for benefits under
the 2002 Farm Bill.
- "Providing record level funding to strengthen
protection against harmful bacteria in meat and poultry products. The
request funds additional food safety inspectors and supports continued
implementation of a science-based food safety inspection system by providing
specialized food safety training to inspectors and other food safety
professionals, increasing microbiological testing, and enhancing the
information available to inspectors for evaluating food safety hazards
that threaten the food supply
- " Supporting the Department’s strategic goal of expanding
international marketing opportunities by providing over $6.0 billion
for the Department’s international programs and activities.
- " Protecting American agriculture from threats to plants and
animals and transfers necessary inspection and research functions to
support the new Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
- "Providing continued support for fundamental and applied
sciences in agriculture, including advancing research on agricultural
genomics and on animal and plant pests and diseases.
- " Providing over $11 billion in loans, grants, and technical
assistance for rural development needs, including electric and telecommunications
systems, water and waste disposal systems, rural housing, and business
and industry.
- " Improving the management and delivery of the Department’s
programs.
" With this as an overview, I would now like to discuss the details
of our budget proposals for 2004.
Homeland Security
"The Department is transferring the border
inspection functions of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’s
(APHIS) Agricultural Quarantine Inspection (AQI) program and the Plum
Island Animal Disease Center to the new DHS. The transfer involves $247
million and nearly 2,700 staff years. A Memorandum of Understanding will
ensure that USDA has access to AQI employees in the event of future outbreaks
of plant and animal pests and diseases.
"The budget requests an increase of nearly
$42 million over that for FY 2003. It will support 7,680 food safety inspectors,
an increase of 80 inspectors, and provide specialized training for the
inspection workforce, increase microbiological testing and sampling, strengthen
foreign surveillance programs and increase public education efforts. In
addition, $30 million will fund efforts by APHIS to expand inspection
services, increase the availability of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines,
provide protection against chronic wasting disease and poultry diseases,
and expand diagnostic and other scientific/technical services. An increase
of $47 million will strengthen laboratory security measures, fund research
on emerging animal diseases, develop new vaccines, create new bio-security
database systems, and continue development of the unified Federal-State
Diagnostic Network for identifying and responding to high risk pathogens.
"The FY 2002 Emergency Supplemental provided
the Department with $328 million for 2002 and 2003 to protect American
agriculture and its food supplies from terrorism. The supplemental provided
$15 million to APHIS for moving laboratory operations from a strip mall
in Ames, Iowa, to the main National Veterinary Services complex. It is
under construction. The supplemental of $50 million to ARS at Ames, Iowa,
is being used as part of the $124 million appropriated by Congress in
recent years for modernization of the research facility. It is awaiting
construction. Another $23 million was allocated to Plum Island, New York.
It is being transferred to DHS for laboratory improvements. Funding of
$115 million was allocated to improve physical and operational security
at USDA labs and facilities, undertake security related research, and
improve cyber security. The planning for this effort is largely completed.
The remaining $125 million was allocated to improve security for food
and agriculture by expanding pest detection and animal health monitoring,
emergency preparedness training and exercises and strengthening the regional
laboratory network. As of January 2003, $124.6 million has been obligated
with the remainder to be spent during 2003.
FARM AND FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICES
"The farm sector in recent years has experienced
lower market returns for several major commodities and recurring losses
from various diseases, pests and other natural disaster-related causes.
While the situation is showing signs of improvement, market returns in
some areas of the farm economy are still low. The new Farm Bill enacted
in 2002 provides additional financial support for the farm economy if
market conditions weaken. The President’s budget for 2004 reflects
the new Farm Bill which added new countercyclical programs to the farm
safety net, reformed other farm programs and substantially expanded the
Department’s conservation programs. In addition, the budget supports
a strong crop insurance program and an aggressive international trade
program that will be critical to improving the farm economy in the next
few years.
Farm Program Delivery
"Farm Service Agency (FSA) salaries and
expenses are funded at $1.3 billion in 2004. This would support staffing
levels of about 5,900 Federal staff years and 10,800 county non-Federal
staff years, including about 1,500 temporary staff years. Temporary staff
will be reduced from the high level required in 2003 because of the heavy
workload associated with the initial implementation of the new farm programs.
However, we expect the workload for FSA to remain at significant levels
in 2004, particularly because of Farm Bill requirements in the conservation
area. Therefore, permanent county non-Federal staff levels are protected
at current levels.
"In order to help FSA meet its workload
challenges, improve service to farmers, and enhance operating efficiency,
the budget provides increased funding of $41.9 million for FSA’s
information technology efforts related to the Service Center Modernization
Initiative. This includes continued installation of geographic information
systems (GIS) and other Common Computing Environment (CCE) initiatives
to help move the delivery system into the e-Government era. The budget
presents these funds as well as funds for the other Service Center agencies
under the CCE appropriation to ensure that these activities are well coordinated.
"Management initiatives to modernize farm
credit program servicing activities and to streamline information technology
and related administrative support for the Service Center activities of
FSA, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and Rural Development
(RD) will also be undertaken in an effort to improve our ability to provide
services at less cost.
International Trade
"One of the key objectives set forth in
the Department’s new strategic plan is the expansion of international
marketing opportunities. As the strategic plan and our earlier review
of the U.S. food and agricultural system in the 21st century make clear,
expanding markets is critical to the long-term health and prosperity of
American agriculture. With 96 percent of the world’s population
living outside the United States, future growth in demand for food and
agricultural products will occur primarily in overseas markets.
"The Department is moving ahead aggressively
to achieve our trade expansion objectives. At the center of these efforts
is negotiation of trade agreements that will reduce trade barriers and
increase market access overseas. At the World Trade Organization, the
United States has presented an ambitious proposal for reform of global
agricultural trade that will eliminate export subsidies and reduce market
access barriers and trade distorting domestic support. At the same time,
the Department is actively engaged in efforts to establish regional free
trade agreements with countries in Central America and southern Africa,
as well as the Free Trade Area of the Americas. Work also has begun to
reach comprehensive trade agreements with Australia and Morocco.
"Our trade policy activities are not limited
to negotiating new agreements, however. As these agreements are implemented,
it is essential that we bolster our efforts to monitor compliance and
ensure that U.S. rights are protected. These efforts are critical to preserving
markets as evidenced by the Department’s work over the past year
to resolve trade disputes, such as China’s restrictions on soybean
imports and Russia’s ban on U.S. poultry imports.
"The Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
is the lead agency in the Department’s international activities
and plays a critical role in our efforts to expand and preserve overseas
markets. To support its activities, the 2004 budget provides a program
level of $145 million for FAS. This is an increase of nearly $10 million
above the 2003 request level and supports a number of important trade-related
activities. Among these is a trade capacity building initiative that will
allow FAS to work with other countries in their implementation of the
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The Protocol is intended to provide uniform
standards for ensuring the safe transport and use of products derived
from biotechnology. Through a series of regional seminars, training sessions,
scientific exchanges, and related activities, FAS will work to ensure
that the Protocol’s provisions are properly interpreted and applied.
This is intended to facilitate the adoption of science-based, transparent,
and non-discriminatory standards and, thereby, help to avoid potential
disruptions in agricultural trade.
"The FAS budget also includes funding for
a USDA contribution to the Montreal Protocol Multilateral Fund. Established
in 1991, the Fund assists developing countries switch from ozone-depleting
substances to safer alternatives. Agricultural issues are expected to
become increasingly important in the Montreal Protocol process, particularly
as the scheduled phase-out date for the use of methyl bromide approaches.
The USDA contribution will help to further U.S. agricultural interests
in the Protocol implementation process.
"Additional funding in support of FAS trade
agreement negotiation, enforcement, and standards-setting activities will
be made available from funds requested for the Office of the Secretary
to conduct USDA cross-cutting trade negotiation and biotechnology activities.
These funds also will be available to bolster efforts by FAS, APHIS, and
other USDA agencies to address market access constraints related to biotechnology.
"The Department’s export promotion
and market development programs are another key component in our efforts
to expand international marketing opportunities. The 2002 Farm Bill increased
funding for many of these programs in order to bolster our trade expansion
efforts, and the President’s budget fully reflects those increases.
"For the Commodity Credit Corporation
(CCC) export credit guarantee programs, the budget includes a program
level of $4.2 billion which continues the programs near their current
level. For the Department’s market development programs, including
the Market Access Program and Cooperator Program, the budget increases
funding to $163 million in 2004. This includes $2 million to continue
the Technical Assistance for Specialty Crops Program authorized by the
Farm Bill and implemented by FAS last year. The budget also includes $57
million for the Dairy Export Incentive Program and $28 million for the
Export Enhancement Program.
"The budget supports a total program level
for U.S. foreign food assistance activities of nearly $1.6 billion. Of
that amount, just over $1.3 billion is provided for the P.L. 480 Title
I credit and Title II donation programs. It also includes a projected
$151 million for the CCC-funded Food for Progress programs which, based
on current price projections, should support 400,000 metric tons of assistance
as required by the Farm Bill. The budget also requests $50 million in
appropriated funding for the new McGovern-Dole International Food for
Education and Child Nutrition Program. As the Committee is aware, the
program is funded through CCC in 2003, but beginning in 2004 is to be
funded through appropriations. This funding level will provide continuity
to new program activities that will begin to be implemented in late 2003.
Farm Credit
"The budget also supports a program level
of about $3.7 billion in farm credit programs to enhance opportunities
for producers to obtain, when necessary, federally-supported operating,
ownership, and emergency credit. The program level is down slightly from
last year due to higher subsidy costs for the direct loan programs. In
addition, funding has been reallocated from guaranteed operating loans
to the direct loan programs to better accommodate the actual demand in
these programs. No additional funding is being requested for the emergency
loan program. Based on current estimates, the budget assumes that carry-over
funding in the emergency loan program will be sufficient to meet demand.
Crop Insurance
"The budget also includes full funding
for the crop insurance program. The budget includes “such sums as
necessary” for the mandatory costs associated with program delivery
and the payment of indemnities. The program is delivered by private insurance
companies, and the Federal Government reimburses the companies for their
delivery costs. The companies may also receive underwriting gains on policies
for which they retain the risk of loss.
"In 2000, Congress substantially reformed
the crop insurance program, in part, by providing for substantial increases
in the premium subsidy available to producers, especially at higher levels
of coverage. Producers have responded by purchasing higher levels of coverage.
As a result, the premium earned per policy has increased from about $1,500
to over $2,300. However, the number of policies sold has remained virtually
steady at about 1.3 million policies, indicating that most policies are
renewal business which requires less sales effort than does the solicitation
of new customers. In addition, technological advances mandated, in part,
by the 2000 reforms have provided producers the opportunity to access
information and to apply for crop insurance electronically.
"The Administration recently announced
that the 2004 book of business would be delivered under the Standard Reinsurance
Agreement that has been in place for a number of years. However, the budget
includes a proposal to cap the amount of delivery expense reimbursement
the companies may receive at 20 percent of the premium. The existing cap
of 24.5 percent has been in place since 1998. This proposal is expected
to save about $68 million in 2004. These savings are achievable because
of improvements in the cost-effectiveness of the delivery system through
the establishment of e-commerce procedures, higher premium dollar policies
for insuring the same number of acres, and more business being done on
a renewal basis.
MARKETING AND REGULATORY PROGRAMS
"Marketing and Regulatory Program agencies
provide the basic infrastructure to protect and improve agricultural market
competitiveness for the benefit of both consumers and U.S. producers.
Pests and Diseases
"Helping protect the health of animal and
plant resources from inadvertent as well as intentional pest and disease
threats has been a primary responsibility of APHIS. The Department is
entering into a Memorandum of Understanding with the DHS regarding the
transfer of the AQI border inspections program. In this regard, APHIS
will retain responsibility for promulgating regulations to protect against
agricultural pests and diseases. DHS will provide access to the AQI inspectors
in the event of future outbreaks. USDA will retain the role of inspecting
passengers and cargoes traveling from Hawaii and Puerto Rico to the mainland
for compliance with specified regulations to protect the health of the
agricultural sector on the mainland.
"The 2004 budget proposes a program level
of slightly more than $800 million for salaries and expenses, an increase
of about $10 million from the current comparable 2003 estimate. Notable
programmatic increases would double efforts against chronic wasting disease,
increase the availability of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines to protect
against a potential outbreak, fund a low-pathogenic avian influenza program,
enhance the ability to track animals and animal products entering and
leaving the country, and expand regulatory enforcement. Further, bio-security
and physical and operational security efforts would be bolstered, as would
veterinary biologic and diagnostic support for the livestock sector. About
$32 million is reduced from specific pest and disease management programs
assuming an increase in cost-sharing for emergency pest and disease outbreaks
by some cooperators. A proposed rule will be published for comment which
will provide the criteria for cost-sharing for all cooperators.
Marketing
"Another important proposal in the marketing
and regulatory programs area involves the Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration (GIPSA). The 2004 budget requests $13 million
to help ensure efficient market functioning. An increase of almost $1
million would fund a new pilot program to audit the top four steer and
heifer meatpackers. The audits are anticipated to result in substantially
better financial protection to the regulated industries through heightened
financial scrutiny. An additional $500,000 would enhance compliance with
the Packers and Stockyards Act and fund a review of the Act. GIPSA will
implement a General Accounting Office recommendation to provide industry
participants with clear information on agency views of competitive activities.
The GIPSA budget also proposes user fees to recover the costs of establishing
and amending U.S. Grain Standards, as well as license fees to recover
costs of the Packers and Stockyards program.
"For the Agricultural Marketing Service
the budget proposes a program level of $297 million of which over 65 percent
will be funded through user fees with the remainder funded through appropriations.
An increase of $1 million in appropriated funds for increased pay costs
is included in order to maintain existing program operations in Marketing
Services and Payments to States.
FOOD SAFETY
"USDA plays a critical role in safeguarding
the food supply and its policies have contributed to the recent decline
in pathogenic contamination of meat and poultry products and the level
of foodborne illness as reported by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. This Administration believes that continued investment in
the food safety infrastructure is necessary to ensure that the appropriate
personnel, tools, and information are available to address the emerging
food safety hazards that threaten public health and the viability of our
agricultural system.
"For 2004, the budget for the Food Safety
and Inspection Service (FSIS) provides a program level of $899 million,
an increase of nearly $42 million over 2003. The budget includes increases
for pay and inflation, the resources necessary to support approximately
7,680 meat and poultry inspectors, an increase of
80 inspectors from 2003. These inspectors are necessary to provide uninterrupted
inspection services to the growing poultry industry. Increased funding
for domestic inspection programs is also requested to take into account
Virginia’s decision to terminate its State inspection program and
Maine’s decision to implement a State inspection program.
"The budget includes an increase of approximately
$16 million to support programmatic improvements aimed at achieving USDA’s
strategic objective to reduce the prevalence of foodborne hazards from
farm-to-table. These program improvements will permit FSIS to continually
assess and update food safety systems in order to ensure the highest level
of safety possible. The following programmatic improvements will be supported
by the budget.
"The budget includes an increase of $2
million to intensify the oversight of foreign inspection systems and inspection
of the meat and poultry products which are exported to the United States.
As more countries seek permission to export meat and poultry products
to the United States, greater efforts will have to be made by inspection
personnel to determine that their inspection systems ensure the level
of safety that we expect here at home. With this funding, the number of
countries being evaluated will increase from 33 to 40.
"The budget also includes a programmatic
increase of $6 million to strengthen FSIS’s microbiological testing
program. First, consistent with recent directives issued by FSIS concerning
the control of E. coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes, FSIS will significantly
increase the level of testing of meat and poultry products for the presence
of these pathogens. With this funding, the number of tests of ready-to-eat
meat and poultry products samples for Listeria and Salmonella will increase
by 50 percent; environmental sampling for Listeria monocytogenes in firms
processing ready-to-eat meat and poultry products will be initiated; and
samples of raw ground beef and ground beef products will more than double.
This level of sampling will give consumers greater assurance that establishments
are effectively controlling or eliminating the presence of pathogens in
meat and poultry products.
"In order to handle the increased level
of testing and to develop the emergency surge capacity in the event of
a bioterrorist incident, the budget includes funding to improve the agency’s
laboratory infrastructure and to increase the number of highly trained
chemists and microbiologists. These improvements are necessary to provide
FSIS the capability it needs to ensure the safety of the products on a
daily basis and to respond effectively to national emergencies involving
the products it regulates.
"FSIS will also conduct nationwide microbiological
baseline studies to provide the long-term data necessary to assess the
ongoing risks presented by the products FSIS regulates. Improved risk
assessments will make inspection decisions more science-based. Consistent
with the Administration’s policy on outsourcing, this laboratory
testing would be conducted by outside laboratories.
"The budget also provides a programmatic
increase of $6 million to improve the scientific and surveillance skills
of FSIS workforce. This represents approximately a 33 percent increase
in FSIS’ training budget and a commitment to raising the base level
of skill of the FSIS workforce. Training will be provided to in-plant
inspectors to enhance the consistency and effectiveness of inspection.
Inspectors highly trained in the latest food safety science and technology,
including skills in assessing establishment Hazard Analysis and Critical
Control Point systems and Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures, must
be the backbone of our food safety infrastructure. In addition, training
needs to be provided to food safety professionals, such as microbiologists,
toxicologists, and risk assessors, in order to improve the development
and enforcement of more science-based regulations.
"An increase of approximately $2 million
is requested to evaluate and design a mass media campaign aimed at improving
the safe food handling practices of consumers. A well educated public
is better prepared to understand and address the food safety hazards they
face and, therefore, will be more confident in the food they buy and eat.
"The 2004 budget also proposes legislation
to collect an additional $122 million in user fees annually by recovering
100 percent of the cost of providing inspection services beyond an approved
primary shift. Recovering a greater portion of these funds through user
fees would result in savings to the taxpayer. These fees will have a minimal
impact on prices received by producers or prices paid at retail by consumers.
FOOD, NUTRITION, AND CONSUMER SERVICES
"The budget includes $44.2 billion for
USDA’s domestic nutrition assistance programs, the highest level
ever requested. The budget will ensure access to food assistance for all
eligible recipients, it will help improve nutritional intakes and reduce
obesity, and it will provide support for those recipients working toward
economic self-sufficiency.
The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children
is budgeted at $4.8 billion. This is a record high funding request, which
funds record levels of at-risk, low-income participants. This request
also includes additional funding for program initiatives, including State
information systems, breastfeeding peer counselors, and childhood obesity
prevention projects. WIC reauthorization is a priority and is assumed
in the budget. Ensuring an appropriately funded WIC program with the best
possible outcomes is a top Administration priority. Further, the budget
includes $20 million for the WIC Farmer’s Market Nutrition Program
and another $15 million in CCC funds for the Senior Farmers’ Market
Nutrition Program.
"The Food Stamp Program, which is the cornerstone
of America’s effort to ensure low-income people have access to an
adequate diet, is funded at $27.5 billion. This covers anticipated food
cost inflation and participation growth of about 1 million participants,
including legal immigrants and others newly eligible based on legislative
changes in the 2002 Farm Bill. Included is a $2 billion contingency reserve,
$1.4 billion for Nutrition Assistance for Puerto Rico, and funds to improve
integrity and Electronic Benefit Transfer. Significant progress has been
made in reducing over and under payment error in the program such that
average State payment accuracy is now 91.34 percent, and overpayment error
averages 6.37 percent of benefits. The budget maintains the emphasis on
program integrity and seeks to reduce error further.
"The Child Nutrition Programs would
be funded at $11.4 billion, also a record for these programs. Increases
are provided for food cost inflation, growth in the number of meals served
and program integrity. Reauthorization of the Child Nutrition Programs
is a priority for this coming year, and the Administration believes the
focus should be on:
- "Ensuring stable and adequate funding for program benefits, especially
for eligible meals served to low-income children who are eligible for
free or reduced price meals;
- "Ensuring access to meals for all children;
- "Providing financial incentives to schools that serve meals
consistent with The Dietary Guidelines; and
- "Streamlining program administration, minimizing administrative
burden, ensuring adequate resources for program oversight, reducing
error and improving program outcomes, while reinvesting any savings
in strengthening the programs.
"The budget also includes a proposal specifically
to explore policy changes to help ensure that all free and reduced price
meal eligibles are correctly certified. USDA studies and national survey
data suggest that a significant number of children approved for free and
reduced price meals are from ineligible households. Correct certifications
are a priority not only because they affect about $7 billion in school
meal funds, but also because a wide array of Federal, State, and local
education resources, totaling considerably more than meal reimbursements,
are targeted to low-income children and schools using the same data. More
accurate certifications will help ensure that these resources are all
targeted correctly. The Administration would fully reinvest any savings
that result from improved payment accuracy to strengthen the programs.
NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT
"The 2002 Farm Bill contains many new conservation
programs designed to protect and enhance the environment. The Department
is now faced with the demanding task of implementing this Farm Bill which
provides nearly $17.1 billion in new conservation funding over the next
10 years. The 2004 budget request in the conservation area recognizes
the importance of this task, as well as the need to continue to support
underlying programs to address the full range of conservation issues at
the national, State, local and farm level.
"The 2004 budget request for NRCS includes
$1.2 billion in appropriated funding, and $1.4 billion in mandatory CCC
financial assistance funding for the Farm Bill conservation programs,
including $850 million for the Environmental Quality Incentive Program.
The appropriated request includes $577 million for conservation technical
assistance for the base programs that support the Department's conservation
partnership with State and local entities. One new element in the NRCS
appropriated account structure, proposed initially in a 2003 budget amendment,
is a new Farm Bill Technical Assistance Account that will provide all
technical assistance associated with the implementation of all the Farm
Bill conservation programs. In 2004, this new appropriated account is
funded at $432 million.
"The 2004 budget for NRCS will also enable
the agency to maintain support for important ongoing activities such as
addressing the problems associated with polluted runoff from animal feeding
operations and providing specialized technical assistance to land users
on grazing lands. In addition, limited increases will be directed to other
high priority activities such as addressing air quality problems in noncompliance
areas, more fully implementing the Customer Service Toolkit, and
establishing a more effective and meaningful monitoring and evaluation
regimen to oversee the implementation of Farm Bill programs.
"The budget also proposes certain other
changes for the watershed programs. With emergency spending being so difficult
to predict, the budget proposes to not seek appropriated funding for emergency
work while partially restoring the ongoing watershed planning and PL-566
programs. This will help address the backlog of unmet community needs
that these programs are designed to meet. Disaster funding will be addressed
as emergencies arise.
"The Department's 2004 budget request maintains
funding for the 368 Resource Conservation and Development areas now authorized.
The ongoing program will continue to improve State and local leadership
capabilities in planning, developing and carrying out resource conservation
programs.
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
"Over 60 million people call rural America
home and relatively few of them are farmers and ranchers. USDA must embrace
this reality and commit to creating new economic opportunities and improving
the quality of life for a diversified rural population. Rural America
needs to share in the Nation’s economic prosperity, in terms of
good jobs and earning potential, homeownership and infrastructure for
community services, including telecommunications to participate in a highly
technological, global society.
"The Administration is committed to bringing
new ideas, new solutions and new approaches to rural America. The 2004
budget reflects this commitment. It includes new programs that are being
implemented using the mandatory funding provided by the 2002 Farm Bill,
and maintains the traditional loan, grant and technical assistance programs
for rural development purposes at realistic levels of funding while offering
new ways to operate these programs. For example, on January 29, 2003,
USDA announced the availability of over $1.4 billion in loans for broadband
telecommunication. This initiative started as a pilot program in 2001
and is on the verge of becoming one of USDA’s most important programs.
It could make the same difference to rural America as the railroads did
in the 19th century and the highway program did in the 20th century.
The 2004 budget proposes $11.9 billion for USDA’s rural development
programs, including $680 million for administrative expenses. This program
level is estimated to cost the Government $2.3 billion in budget authority,
which compares to about $2.6 billion in the President’s 2003 budget.
Because interest rates have declined, the subsidy costs for most direct
loan programs are lower than those reflected in the 2003 budget. The 2004
budget maintains these programs at their 2003 levels, which results in
a savings in budget authority.
The 2004 budget maintains the water and waste disposal program at an overall
program level of $1.5 billion. However, it proposes that the amount of
grants included in this level be reduced from $587 million to $346 million.
Because the subsidy rate is only about 3.33 percent for direct loans,
compared to 100 percent for grants, the shift toward more loans would
maintain the same program level as the 2003 President’s budget while
achieving a substantial savings in budget authority. The lowest interest
rates in a decade should allow more communities to repay loans rather
than rely on grants. In addition, mandatory funding provided by the 2002
Farm Bill was used to fund a backlog of projects that needed a substantial
portion of their funding through grants in order to be viable. Recent
applications indicate that more projects can be funded through loans alone
or with only a moderate grant.
Electric loans are maintained at a $2.6 billion level. However, the
amount available for direct loans at the 5 percent interest rate would
be increased from $121 million to $240 million. This increase is intended
to serve areas with low density and high consumer costs as well as other
hardships. Further, USDA intends to ask electric borrowers, most of which
qualified for eligibility based on service areas defined decades ago,
to recertify that they are still serving rural areas, rather than urban
or suburban areas.
"Loans for broadband access were
initiated as a pilot program in 2001. The 2002 Farm Bill provided the
statutory authority and mandatory funding for this initiative. The 2004
budget provides for an increase in discretionary funding for broadband
loans from $80 million in the 2003 budget to $196 million for 2004. This
increase reflects the Administration’s support for bringing internet
and broadband services to rural areas, and its belief that this activity
should compete for funding under the annual budget process. Therefore,
the 2004 budget proposes rescinding the mandatory funding for broadband
loans that the 2002 Farm Bill makes available for 2004. The mandatory
funding relating to the January 29, 2003, announcement is reflected in
the budget as being used in 2003. However, this funding remains available
until expended.
"The 2004 budget also includes $2
million for broadband grants. As has been the policy since 2001 when the
program was established, these grants will be used to assist a few small
communities that lack the repayment capacity for loans.
"With regard to the rest of the telecommunications
programs, the budget includes $495 million for telecommunication direct
loans, and $50 million in direct loans and $25 million in grants for the
distance learning and telemedicine program. These levels are the same
as those requested for 2003. Further, the 2004 budget contains the Administration’s
prior proposal to stop funding the loan-making activities of the Rural
Telephone Bank (RTB). The RTB is fully capable of obtaining funds to make
loans through commercial channels as soon as it is privatized through
the redemption of its Class A stock, which the Government holds.
"The business and industry guaranteed
loan program is funded at a program level of $602 million, down from $733
million in 2003. The decrease reflects an increase in subsidy costs due
to both increased losses on guarantees made in prior years and technical
adjustments.
"Section 502 direct loans for single
family housing would be increased from $957 million in 2003 to almost
$1.4 billion in 2004. This increase would contribute to meeting the President’s
goal of increasing minority homeownership. In addition, the 2004 budget
includes $2.725 billion for Section 502 guaranteed loans, including $225
million for refinancing. While there have been shortfalls in demand for
these guarantees in prior years, the Administration recently lowered the
fees to bring them more in line with what other Federal agencies charge.
This change is expected to ensure a strong demand for the program through
2004. Section 502 direct and guaranteed loans are expected to provide
about 49,000 homeownership opportunities in 2004.
"Consistent with last year’s
budget proposal, the 2004 budget does not include funding for new construction
of Section 515 rural rental housing projects. This proposal reflects concern
about the long-term cost of the Government for maintaining the existing
portfolio of 17,800 projects, and the need to find more cost-effective
ways to provide housing support for rural residents with very low income.
Many of these projects are over 20 years old and in need of repair or
rehabilitation. They also require substantial amounts of rental assistance
payments to remain viable. USDA has already initiated a review of alternatives
for servicing the portfolio and developing options for making loans for
new projects at less cost to the Government. Direct loans for repair,
rehabilitation and preservation would continue to be made. The 2004 budget
would support $71 million for these purposes. Further, the 2004 budget
provides $740 million for rural rental assistance payments, which is sufficient
to renew all expiring contracts and to support new construction of $59
million of farm labor housing projects.
"In addition, the 2004 budget includes
an estimated savings of $5 million for sales of loan assets. USDA’s
RD mission area, along with FSA, will be evaluating the potential for
conducting such sales on a regular basis.
RESEARCH, EDUCATION, AND ECONOMICS
"Publicly supported agricultural
research has provided the foundation for modern agriculture and is an
important component of virtually all of our strategic objectives. Research
will lead to commercially feasible renewable energy and biobased products
with benefits to the environment, national security, and farm income.
Genetic and molecular biology hold promise to reduce plant and animal
diseases that threaten U.S. agriculture as the movement of plants and
animals increases and as bioterrorism becomes a matter of increasing concern.
There are technology-based opportunities to make our food supply safer
and more wholesome that need to be exploited to address serious human
health-related problems.
"The 2004 budget for the four Research,
Education and Economics agencies is approximately $2.3 billion, nearly
the same as 2003 budget level. The 2004 budget follows the general pattern
of the 2003 budget with reductions in earmarked programs and program increases
in areas where needs and returns are the greatest. The budget also includes
increases for pay costs, homeland security related activities, information
technology and other infrastructure requirements.
"The centerpiece of the 2003 budget
was the proposal to move aggressively towards the full authorization level
for the National Research Initiative (NRI). The proposal in the 2004 budget
is based on the same underlying policy objective, but in a way that is
consistent with the greater overall constraints of the 2004 budget. The
proposal for $200 million for the NRI will finance work that will have
an immediate impact on such issues as emerging diseases of plants and
animals, biosecurity, air quality, and food and nutrition. The NRI provides
critical support for mapping and sequencing the genomes of organisms of
importance to agriculture. These projects are carried out in the major
Federal genome sequencing centers in cooperation with other agencies including
the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Energy, and the National
Science Foundation, where USDA funds are highly leveraged.
"The 2004 budget for the Agricultural
Research Service (ARS) calls for increases to support participation in
genome mapping and sequencing projects and enhance the agency’s
bioinformatics capacity to transfer this information into research programs.
There are increases for work on animal diseases and biosecurity to develop
new vaccines, rapid diagnostic tests, and genome data on biosecurity threat
agents. The research will lead to improved vaccines and therapeutics against
foot and mouth disease and the newly emerging and most threatening swine
disease, known as porcine reproductive respiratory syndrome or PRRS.
"The budget includes funds to install
security countermeasures in ARS laboratories. Security assessments and
initial investments in countermeasures were funded through the 2002 emergency
supplemental funding. Assessments of all ARS facilities are being completed
and funds in the 2004 budget will be used for the highest priority projects.
At this time, such security measures represent the highest priority for
the Buildings and Facilities account. Congress has appropriated a total
of $124 million in recent years for implementation of the animal health
facilities in Ames, Iowa. No funding is proposed in the 2004 budget as
security of existing facilities is the higher priority for this year.
The Administration will reconsider the full range of options for future
modernization of these facilities and present recommendations in the FY
2005 budget.
"The 2004 budget for the Cooperative
State Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES) includes funds
to continue the formula programs for the 1862 institutions at current
levels and increase formula payments to the 1890 institutions as a step
towards funding these programs at the higher authorization levels established
in the 2002 Farm Bill. There are also proposed increases in funds for
the 1994 Tribal Land Grant schools and an increase in the CSREES graduate
fellowship program that will allow more funding for fellowships at the
masters degree level which is especially important for recruiting minority
graduate students. Finally, there is an increase in the Outreach and Technical
Assistance Program authorized under Section 2501 of the 1990 Farm Bill
which is now being administered by CSREES. Our goals for the 2501 program
are to encourage and assist socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers
own and operate farms and ranches and participate in USDA programs. With
increased funding to $4 million we will be making more awards, for longer
periods of time, to a wide range of community-based entities.
"The budget for the Economic Research
Service (ERS) includes an increase for two initiatives. An increase of
$1 million for a Security Analysis System for U.S. agriculture (SAS-USA)
to provide information critical for the mitigation of security threats
and attacks to the Nation’s agriculture and food supply. The system
will integrate spatial and economic data with analysis functions to deliver
security assessments and recommendations to key decision makers within
a short timeframe. An increase of $1.1 million will allow ERS to investigate
consumer behavior, particularly in U.S. export markets, towards foods
modified by genomic and other agricultural biotechnology innovations.
"The budget for the National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) includes an increase for three initiatives and
a decrease of $16.5 million for the Census of Agriculture, reflecting
the decrease in staffing and activity levels to be realized in 2004 due
to the cyclical nature of the 5-year census program.
"An increase of $4.8 million is requested
to help restore and modernize NASS’ core survey and estimation program
for U.S. agricultural commodities and other economic, environmental and
rural data. These data are used by a variety of customers for business
decisions, policy making, research, and other issues. They are also necessary
for the calculation of national countercyclical payments rates provided
under the 2002 Farm Bill.
"An increase of $1.6 million for
NASS’ Locality-Based Agricultural County estimates program continues
the improvements included in the 2003 budget request. These local estimates
are one of the most requested data sets, and are especially important
to the Risk Management Agency (RMA) for their risk rating process, (affecting
premium levels paid by producers), and to FSA for calculating national
loan deficiency payments.
"Finally, an increase of $3.25 million
is requested to support NASS’ efforts as the lead agency for two
of USDA’s enterprise-wide e-Government initiatives, Survey Capability
and Data Management. This funding will allow NASS to develop the infrastructure
necessary for electronic data reporting for its surveys, thereby reducing
the reporting burden on farmers and ranchers.
DEPARTMENTAL MANAGEMENT
"The Departmental staff offices provide
leadership, coordination and support for all administrative and policy
functions of the Department. These offices are vital to USDA's success
in providing effective customer service and efficient program delivery.
Salaries and benefits often comprise 90 percent or more of these offices-
budgets, leaving them little flexibility to reduce other expenditures
needed to continue their operations. The 2004 budget proposes funding
required to ensure that these offices maintain the staffing levels needed
to provide management leadership, oversight and coordination.
"These offices also have key responsibilities
related to the President's Management Agenda and other departmentwide
and agency-specific management reforms, which are crucial to making the
Department an efficient, effective and discrimination-free organization
that delivers the best return on taxpayers' investments.
The Department has made significant progress in improving management.
Examples are:
- "The Department has a new strategic plan which is being used
to communicate and drive our programmatic, budget and management priorities.
- "The Department received its first-ever unqualified or “clean”
opinion on the FY 2002 financial statements, significantly reduced delinquent
debt and all of the Department’s agencies now use a single financial
information system that meets Federal standards.
- "The Department’s National Finance Center was one of four
winners of a governmentwide competition to streamline payroll service
providers. It also helps nearly 3 million Thrift Savings Plan participants
manage and track their investments.
"USDA’s customers can increasingly
conduct business with the Department online, saving them and the Department
time and money over the long term.
"The FY 2004 budget builds upon that
progress by continuing funding levels for these offices and providing
key funding increases in order to:
- "Provide $6.6 million to appropriate agencies, such as APHIS,
FAS, and GIPSA, through the Office of the Secretary to address cross-cutting
trade related challenges. Additional resources are needed for trade
negotiations and enforcement actions, as well as in solving biotechnology
issues related to market access and regulatory standards. This request
will allow Secretarial level coordination, flexibility and resource
sharing to target current trade issues.
- "Meet demands for Departmental coordination of homeland security
efforts, including emergency planning and strengthened physical and
cyber security in light of the September 11, 2001, attacks
.
- "Continue efforts to modernize the Service Center agencies (FSA,
NRCS, and RD) to improve efficiency and customer service. A key element
in these plans is the maintenance of a CCE for the Service Center agencies
and RMA acceleration of our efforts to acquire and use Geospatial Information
Systems (GIS). The CCE and GIS are critical to providing electronic
services to USDA customers.
- "Continue renovations of the South Building to ensure that employees
and customers have a safe and modern working environment.
- "Enable the new Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights to guide
civil rights activities. The President has nominated Vernon Parker as
the new Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and we look forward to
a quick confirmation.
- "Enhance outreach efforts to provide all of our customers with
information about our programs
.
- "Enable the Offices of the General Counsel and the Inspector
General to provide needed services to the Department.
"That concludes my statement. I look forward
to working with the Committee on the 2004 budget so that we can better
serve those who rely on USDA programs and services.
#
|